I was perplexed by the fact that God's name is there behind most of the violences, riots, unrests, terrorist attacks and many other heinous crimes.
- Amarnath land transfer imbroglio in the name of Lord Amarnathji,
- Demolition of Babri Masjid in the name of Lord Rama,
- Killing of over 130 innocents due to stampede at Naina Devi temple,
- Attacks on temples (Ex Akshrdhama), mosques (Ex Babri Masjid), churches (Ex 2007 Orissa violence) to demonstrate the superiority of one religion over other,
- Use of god's name for personal gain Ex: BJP's 'Rath Yatra', using the name of 'Lord Shriram' for political gains, discrimination in the name of secularism (Ex: wowing muslims to gain votes, Cast politics at grass root level).
- Spending crores and crores of rupees on holy events at temples, mosques, churches.
- Above all incinerating religious comparisons (take a look at these videos).
After all, god is supposed to protect humanity. Why is he silent (if he exist)? If Amarnathji is compassionate about mankind, why can't he help us break the impasse reached at Kashmir, his own home? (I am not arguing against god here, I am still agnostic about the existence of god).
The issue here is not the existence of god, but the use of God's name and diversified religious faiths to attain personal gains. For example, Omar Abdullah
said, "As long as there is a single Muslim in Kashmir, the Amarnath yatra will never stop." He
spoke vociferously in the parliament about being "an Indian first and Muslim later" (the Indian Nationalism), now he takes a complete U turn and
speaks about "Kashmir Nationalism" and Azaadi. Leaders in Kashmir, especially the leaders of the
All Parties Hurriyat Conference (APHC),
Jammu and Kashmir Liberation front (JKLF)
mastermind the protests which lead to the killing of innocents in Kashmir.
"The APHC does not recognize the Indian Constitution and has stayed away from all elections held in the state of
Kashmir so far. It blames the lack of sincerity of India for the failure of the repeated attempts at the resolution of the Kashmir issue. It has consistently criticized and Accused the Indian Troops present in Kashmir of Human Rights Violations [
wiki]." If they think government is not capable of handling Kashmir, why can't they contest democratic elections and win to rule (or serve) Kashmir? Why can't they choose the democratic way of resolving Kashmir issue? The protests and violences in Kashmir are not showing the road to peace, but demonstrating the vested interests of leaders who are masterminding the violence. Here is a quick look at
what exactly happened behind Amarnath land issue.
- In the year 2000, Farooq Abdullah government had enacted “the J&K Shrine Board Act’’ to provide basic facilities to pilgrims and managing the religious shrine.
- Later, state government refused to allocate any land to run the functions of the shrine board effectively.
- A writ petition was filed in J&K high court demanding the land transfer.
- On April 15, 2005, a single-judge bench upheld the decision to transfer land to the shrine board.
- Consequently, J&K government had allotted 100 acres (0.40 km2) of forest land to the Shri Amarnathji Shrine Board (SASB ) out of the total land area of 15,520.3 km2 (5,992.4 sq mi) in the main Kashmir valley.
- Now this is what is at the center of the whole agitation. The separatists as well as the opposition parties in J&K now demand that this land transfer be annulled. The nationalists and people in Jammu want the land to be transfered to Shrine Board. A clear divide between people of Jammu and people of Kashmir is thus visible [courtesy].
Now the mere land transfer issue (in the name of god and religious faiths) is becoming a precursor to what is being called as Azaadi for Kashmir. Here is how the entire situation got worse [
wiki],
- Six people were killed and 100 injured when police fired into a crowd in Srinagar protesting the transfer of land.
- Separatist JKLF (R) organized a march to the controversial land in Baltal. The death of a JKLF(R) activist in a fire opened by the Security Forces became the flash point for protests in the Kashmir valley region.
- Some environmentalists argued that the land transfer would hamper the region's delicate ecological balance.
- The protests and violences became pervasive in Kashmir and situation went out of control.
- People's Democratic Party (PDP) said that it would withdraw support to the Indian National Congress (INC)-led state government if it did not revoke the land transfer agreement.
- The state government accepted the demands of PPP and the Muslim protesters. Govt revoked the land transfer decision on July 1,2008.
- Hindu groups in the Jammu region organized counter protests and demanded that the land must be transfered to Shrine board.
- The crisis deepened further when the PDP didn't lend support to the state government even after the revocation of land transfer.
- On 11 August 2008, around 2,50,000 Kashmiri protesters attempted to cross the LoC to Muzaffarabad, in violation of march ban orders. Fifteen people were killed including APHC separatist leader Sheikh Abdul Aziz and hundreds more injured when police and paramilitary forces opened fire on protesters attempting to cross the LoC.
- With increasing number of protests and killings, the noise of 'Azad Kashmir' resurfaced.
Thus, a mere land transfer issue raised an unheard v(n)oise of "Azad Kashmir". A small issue, which could have been resolved peacefully if leaders were ready to sit across the negotiation table. Freedom should be respected and honored but not to a ridiculous extent of demanding partition. We have already seen bloodshed due to the
partition of Bengal (during British rule),
Partition of India & Pakistan, Partition of
Bangladesh, and yet leaders of Kashmir & separatist have not learnt their lesson. Pakistan's
attempts to provoke Kashmiris into joining the pro-independence protests are clear indications of its desperation for Kashmir. Pakistan should stop its gross interference in our internal affairs and focus on issues where it has a
locus standi.
Azaadi (Independence) to Kashmir is quixotic. The situation gets worse if Kashmir become independent, it cannot sustain economic, political and fundamentalistic onslaught. More over, increasing heinous acts of terrorism will only add to the mess. Kashmir is an integral part of India and being so is good for both Kashmir and rest of India.